User talk:ReneeWrites
Add topic|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
|
|
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of Sint-Katharinakerk, Hoogstraten, southern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Van Goghkerkje, list of preachers of the Van Gogh Church in Zundert, which includes the father of Vincent van Gogh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Kruisiging.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Herrijzenis van Jezus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Hemelvaart van Jezus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Christus in de tempel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Geboorte van Jezus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - De angst in Getsemane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Visitatie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Tenhemelopneming van Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Presentatie van Jezus in de tempel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk Altaar O.L.V. van de Rozenkrans paneel - Kruisdraging.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoogstraten Sint-Katharinakerk epitaaf Philip de Lalaing en Anna van Rennenberg schuin-vooraanzicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Prince Nicholas Leopold of Salm-Salm, front view of full grave monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Pools militair ereveld Breda memorial cross, viewed from the north-west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
"Festivals in Tibet"
[edit][1]: it is not in Tibet, it is a Tibetan festival in Seattle. - Jmabel ! talk 17:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I removed the category. Its parent category Category:Festál already covers other categories that would otherwise be put in its place. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:53, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Thanks...
[edit]...for all the CFD closes you've been doing. :) -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) ReneeWrites (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Actors depicting Sherlock Holmes
[edit]I see you replace the cat "Sherlock Holmes actors" by "Actors depicting Sherlock Holmes". When making this kind of changes in the future, please insure that the items in the old cat are moved to the new one. Otherwise the work of the other Commons editors gets lost and must be done all over again. Judithcomm (talk) 09:26, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Judithcomm: Category:Sherlock Holmes actors was emptied and relevant contents were moved to Category:Actors depicting Sherlock Holmes. I think there is a slight misunderstanding on how these categories are used, we no longer categorize actors themselves by which roles they performed (see the outcome of this CfD: Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/05/Category:Actors by role) but instead limit it to media of that actor in that role.
- So Category:Benedict Cumberbatch and Category:Ian McKellen should not be categorized as "Actors depicting Sherlock Holmes" (because a lot of media in these categories has no relation to their performance as Holmes), instead we categorize it like this: Category:Basil Rathbone as Sherlock Holmes. See also the subcategories of Category:Actors by fictional character for more examples. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2025 (UTC)










